Airline overbooking. It’s misjudged, misinterpreted, and mischaracterized. Most people don’t understand it—if it were a person, it’d be an odd cross between Donald Trump and Truman Capote. You’re not sure you get it, you don’t think you like it, but it usually makes for an interesting story and is the butt of jokes by comedians on late-night talk shows. However, overbooking is actually easily explained and understood; is the subject of a huge amount of statistical analysis; and is a bona-fide science in its own right!
Overbooking is the practice of accepting more reservations on a
flight than there are seats. Most folks have two questions about
overbooking: “why?” and “how?” The “why” is easy to explain—it’s an
airline’s way of counteracting “no-shows,” which are Customers who make
confirmed reservations for flights and then, for whatever reason, fail
to show up. Without overbooking, no-shows would cause almost all
fully-booked flights to leave with empty seats. And an airline seat is
a completely perishable commodity—when a seat on a flight departs the
gate empty, it is lost and can’t ever be used. Put another way, the
potential for revenue lost due to no-shows could easily undermine
Southwest’s Low-Fare Leadership…and the art of overbooking helps
prevents that.
That’s the “why.” The “how” is harder to explain, but it is way more
interesting. The science surrounding overbooking combines the
mathematics of probability and of detailed, historical analysis, mixes
in a healthy measure of behavioralistic research, then uses all of that
to predict what percentage of bookings for a given flight leg, on a
given day, will fail to show up. The numbers of people that book but
don’t show have very definite trends that, absent a few “except for
when this happens…” things thrown in just to keep things exciting, make
predicting no-show rates a surprisingly exact and successful (if
occasionally stressful) science.
Comments